Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images

Quangos are out of control – and ministers like it that way

Prime Ministers have been piling up new quangos for 70 years: Tony Blair created 92

Britain’s quangos have a total expenditure greater than the GDP of Norway

Keir Starmer’s Government created 27 quangos in its first eight months

Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images

Share this article

Calls for a ‘bonfire of the quangos’ have been made since David Cameron’s time as Leader of the Opposition all the way through to Keir Starmer’s premiership. Yet for all the rhetoric, the quangocracy has grown bigger, better staffed and more powerful, as is detailed in the TaxPayers’ Alliance’s new quango database.

With over 500,000 staff and a total expenditure greater than the GDP of Norway, the reliance on these ‘arm’s-length bodies’ by ministers, and therefore the impact on our lives, has never been greater. Since Anthony Eden took office 70 years ago, every Prime Minister who has stayed in office for a full year has created a quango. Tony Blair created 92, the most of any Prime Minister. Even David Cameron, the man who first promised the great bonfire, created 54. 

Keir Starmer has continued on this train. From promising reform in opposition, the first eight months of Labour saw the creation of 27 new quangos. These range from Great British Energy, which – rather than tapping into the vast resource wealth of the North Sea, will ensure Britain continues to spend heavily on wind farms – to the Industrial Strategy Advisory Council, which will take advice from trade unions on how best to unleash growth in the economy.

Admittedly, some of these newly created bodies, such as the Border Security Command, are more a merger of existing quangos than genuinely new institutions. The Government has also had some success in cutting back existing quangos. Labour is, in fact, abolishing the most costly quango of 2023–24: NHS England.

While the decision is bolder than many anticipated, Britain must look beyond a mere reduction in the number of these organisations. We need a reduction in their total spending and, most crucially, a reduction in their functions. Tinkering with mergers and rebrandings is not enough. All too often, abolishing a quango simply means it is folded into a larger body, which carries on spending and regulating as before. This must change.

Take the last government’s abolition of Public Health England. Rather than a step back in the size and role of the state, a more powerful body was created in the UK Health and Security Agency. The current Government is following a similar approach by having an existing quango, HMRC, subsume the Valuation Office Agency without any loss of functions. In both cases, the overall number of quangos has been reduced, but without any of their functions being abolished.

Even worse is the Government’s desire to create quangos in previously quango-free industries. One of Britain’s most commercially successful and globally revered industries, football, will soon have the Independent Football Regulator intervening in the running of clubs and leagues. Football is already successful, already largely sustainable and already sees clubs protected by the Football Association – what is the need for the regulator?

Every department embraces ‘arm’s-length’ governance, with Culture, Media and Sport leading the way with 41 quangos. Yet these bodies are not really accountable to departments. They take the money and spend it as they wish – usually by inventing fresh regulations to police. With so many quangos performing so many functions, no minister can possibly keep control. And when things go wrong, ministers simply deflect responsibility. A convenient arrangement.

The direct consequence for voters is that quangos provide a shield behind which ministers can hide. Ministers have blamed these bodies for everything from failures during Covid to the decline in school performance. Rarely do they accept a problem as their own fault. Perhaps they were unaware of what an arm’s-length body was doing on a daily basis; perhaps it was operating beyond its scope; perhaps it was even acting in ways contrary to the governing party’s manifesto pledges. Whatever the excuse, the conclusion should be the same: the quango state must be reduced by stripping these bodies of their functions and restoring control and accountability to ministers – and, through them, to voters.

Starmer has said he wants to abolish the ‘cottage industry of checkers and blockers slowing down delivery for working people’. Restoring NHS England to the control of the Health Secretary is a good start. But unweaving the network of quangos that govern Britain will be a long process — and we are not moving nearly quickly enough.

Share this article

Written by

Callum McGoldrick is a researcher at the TaxPayers' Alliance.

CapX depends on the generosity of its readers.

If you value what we do, please consider making a donation.

Amount
Period

Your message has not been sent.