10 January 2020

Is the British economy set for a Brexit bounce?

By

The forecasts for 2020 suggest another lacklustre year in store for the British economy.

The median prediction for GDP growth, according to the latest survey of independent forecasters compiled by HM Treasury, is just 1%. That would be the weakest annual figure since the recession of 2008-09. In particular, investment is expected to remain sluggish, largely because of persistent Brexit uncertainty. The good news is that the consensus is usually wrong, and, in this case, it already looks too pessimistic.

Let’s focus on Brexit (although there are other reasons to be optimistic, including an easing in political uncertainty more generally, and signs of an improvement in the global backdrop).

Many commentators are still sniffy about the Tory election pledge to ‘Get Brexit Done’. They argue that the official departure from the EU on 31st January is only one small step in a potentially lengthy and difficult process. This process will include the first serious negotiations about the future relationship, and a ‘transition period’, lasting until the end of 2020, when not much will actually change.

There are indeed still plenty of ways that Brexit could play out, with different implications for the economy. The UK government’s ambitious aim is to conclude a comprehensive free trade agreement with the EU this year, covering all major sectors and, crucially, which allows for some future regulatory divergence. For now, at least, the EU is dead set against this, preferring to prioritise some sectors (for example, fisheries before financial services), and insisting on full regulatory harmonisation as part of the price for unfettered market access.

The timetable is challenging too. Realistically, most of the groundwork will need to be completed in the first six months, with everything sorted by October or November. Indeed, new Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has already claimed that it is “basically impossible” to negotiate a full future-relationship deal and have it ratified by the end of 2020.

Brexit pessimists have therefore focused on what could still go wrong. If a substantial deal can’t be done in time, there are three main alternatives.

One is that the talks break down and the transition period concludes at the end of 2020 without a new UK-EU trade agreement. This wouldn’t quite be ‘no deal’. Some important aspects of the Withdrawal Agreement, such as the special arrangements for Northern Ireland, would presumably remain in place.

There could also be new ‘bare bones’ provisions covering other essential areas too, such as security cooperation and rules to keep planes flying. But this first scenario would mean new tariffs and non-tariff barriers, albeit with some important benefits too from a cleaner break from the EU.

A second scenario is what Ivan Rogers has described as a “quick and dirty tariff- and quota-free deal, involving stringent level playing field conditions and an agreement on fisheries next year, deferring other issues until later”. In other words, a temporary deal very much on the EU’s terms.

The third alternative (not much different from the second) would be to find some way to extend the transition period beyond the end of 2020, effectively keeping the UK in the Single Market and EU’s Customs Union, even though Parliament has now passed legislation that rules this out.

This all suggests that Brexit uncertainty will remain high, and continue to weigh heavily on investment for some time yet. But I think there are three reasons to be much more optimistic.

First, the EU is likely to give some more ground. Brexit pessimists often assume that the EU holds all the cards, but it is clearly in the economic interests of both sides to do a deal. What’s more, the EU’s opening position is unreasonable. Rather than full harmonisation, most global trade agreements allow for some divergence based on well-established principles such as mutual recognition or equivalence, as long as basic standards are met and common objectives achieved. In practice, the UK will surely continue to exceed these standards.

Second, the confirmation that the UK is indeed leaving the EU is more than just a small step. Unless you are one of those that believe that the economy will definitely now go to hell in a handcart, this reduction in uncertainty is worth something. Those businesses most directly affected by the precise terms of departure will continue to worry about Brexit, but it will no longer dominate the news in the negative ways it has for most of the past three and a half years. In the meantime, the Government will also be freer to focus on other priorities, from infrastructure spending to social care.

Third, the recent survey data have been encouraging. The Bank of England’s Decision Maker Panel (DMP) survey of Chief Financial Officers showed only a small drop in Brexit-related uncertainty immediately after the election. But this has since been overtaken by several other indicators. In particular, the latest Deloitte CFO survey reported the biggest increase in optimism in its 11-year history, with Brexit no longer the top concern. What’s more, respondents expected UK companies to increase capital spending for the first time in four years.

The recovery in the pound since Boris Johnson became PM is also, on balance, a positive. We can debate whether a stronger currency is actually a ‘good thing’. But there is little doubt that the inflationary impact of the fall in sterling was one of the two main ways (alongside the hit to investment) in which Brexit uncertainty has held back the UK economy since the 2016 referendum.

Overall, then, I’m still happy to count myself a Brexit optimist. The weak finish to 2019 will make it hard for GDP growth to exceed 1.5% in 2020 as a whole. But whatever the precise number, increasing clarity over Brexit should be reflected in a meaningful pick-up over the course of the year, with investment one of the bright spots.

Click here to subscribe to our daily briefing – the best pieces from CapX and across the web.

CapX depends on the generosity of its readers. If you value what we do, please consider making a donation.

Donate

Recurring Payment

Thanks for your support

Something went wrong

An error occured, but no error message was recieved.

Please try again, or if problems persist, contact us with the above error message. We apologise for the inconvenience.

Julian Jessop is an independent economist